Running Time: 110 minutes
Directed By: Charles Vidor
Written By: Jo Eisinger, E.A. Ellington
Main Cast: Rita Hayworth, Glenn Ford, George Macready, Joseph Calleia, Steven Geray
Click here to view the trailer
THERE NEVER WAS A WOMAN LIKE GILDA
Taking a brief respite from my conquering of 60s cinema, I decided to take a look at Rita Hayworth's famous role in "Gilda", after seeing a snippet of the film in "The Shawshank Redemption". Suffice it to say that I was highly disappointed!
Johnny Farrell (Ford) is a gambler, but more importantly he's a cheating gambler who "makes his own luck", as he likes to say. One evening, after winning a mint in a game of cards, someone attempts to rob Johnny of his winnings. Luckily for Johnny, he is saved at the last minute by a cane wielding, older gentlemen, who later introduces himself as Ballin Mundson (Macready). Mundson tells Johnny of a casino in Buenos Aries (where the film is set), but warns him that cheaters aren't welcome. When Johnny goes to scope out the joint, he can't help but resort to his underhanded tactics and cheat the casino out of a few thousand pesos. When Johnny is caught, he is taken to see the owner of the casino, only to find that it's Mundson's joint. After a brief conversation, Johnny offers Ballin his services and is hired on to work there. A while later, Ballin and Johnny have become as thick as thieves, however when Ballin returns home with his new wife Gilda (Hayworth) in tow, the seeds of a souring relationship are planted. It also becomes apparent, a little while later, that Johnny and Gilda have had some sort of previous relationship.
Let me start with what I liked about the picture. While I didn't find Hayworth as intoxicating as I always thought she'd be, I did very much enjoy her little "striptease" near the end of the picture. In the scene, Gilda sings "Put the Blame on Mame", while donning a black dress, complete with black gloves. Halfway through her performance, Hayworth peels off the glove from her right hand sending the men in the club into a frenzy. It's almost as if Hayworth knew the effect that this scene would have on audiences and this is the moment in the film where I feel she really shined. In peeling off one, single glove, Hayworth might as well have completely disrobed because the desire in her eyes during the scene and her body language was enough to warrant the same reaction no matter what she took off. However, other than that scene, I found Hayworth a completely forgettable actress (judging on this performance alone) and a big disappointment. I also though the camerawork was quite excellent, as the film provides more than a handful of amazing shots and a real noir-ish feel, without really being a film noir.
SPOILER ALERT!
However, that's about all that I can conjure up for the positives column when it comes to "Gilda". The story was just so foolish that I just couldn't allow myself to get wound up in it. Guy A saves Guy B's life. Later, after Guy B cheats Guy A, Guy A decides to hire Guy B to work for him. Then Guy A gets married, but Guy B gets a little jealous...not of the woman, but actually jealous of Guy A. Then nothing happens for what seems like an eternity. Then Guy A is thought dead, so Guy B marries his wife. Then Guy B hates the woman, then he loves, then he hates her again, then they kiss and the credits roll. It's just so stupid! For the most part, the plot made absolutely no sense. The characters had absolutely no motivation to be doing what they were doing and really, they were just going through the motions to provide the world with a Hayworth vehicle and rake in the men who'd want to get a look at this dame. I didn't care about these characters, nor did I care how their situations ended. When it came down to it, all I wanted was for "Gilda" to go bye-bye.
RATING: 4.5/10 There's a little bit of good, but it's all weighed down by the bad. This film couldn't even make it to the average marker, so that's a fair rating, in my eyes.
MOVIES WATCHED: 357
MOVIES LEFT TO WATCH: 644
November 30, 2011 11:32pm
Thursday, December 1, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Sins of Omission - Entry #94: ZODIAC (2007)
Running Time: 157 minutes Directed By: David Fincher Written By: James Vanderbilt, based on the book by Robert Graysmith Main Cast : Jake...
-
Running Time: 118 minutes Directed By: Louis Malle Written By: Louis Malle Main Cast: Benoit Ferreux, Lea Massari, Daniel Gelin, Fa...
-
Running Time: 142 minutes Directed By: Volker Schlondorff Written By: Jean-Claude Carriere, Gunter Grass, Franz Seitz, Volker Schlondor...
-
Running Time: 157 minutes Directed By: David Fincher Written By: James Vanderbilt, based on the book by Robert Graysmith Main Cast : Jake...
You know how sometimes you reviews get me (even if only for a short time) to reconsider some films I don't relish.. but you write such a convincing posative piece.. Well this time you made me rethink about a film I really like and wonder if it reall is as good as I think it is. Maybe at times I just go 'Oh it's a 409's B&W Noir, it must be good'. Your comments are very good and have sowed a seed of doubt.
ReplyDeleteOk, I've not had time to rewatch.. I will.. but I think I will retain my view! But again, its good to question long held views, and you do that well.
Ray
Ray, your comments always give me a little boost and make me feel good about the writing I'm doing here. Always love reading your thoughts, whether we agree or disagree.
ReplyDeleteSomehow the characters didn't work for me here. They felt like stereotypes of the '40s anti-hero, villian, and dame, rather than three dimensional characters I would actually care about. They did a great job making Rita Hayworth look good, though. And it was one of the rare noir-ish films to have a happy ending... not sure how I feel about that. I was definitely expecting either Gilda or Farrell to bite it in the end.
ReplyDeleteThis was a forgettable one for me. The only notable thing I can recall is Hayworth singing. And yeah, these old noirs need to have unhappy endings, for sure.
Delete