Showing posts with label Robert Aldrich. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Robert Aldrich. Show all posts

Sunday, December 21, 2014

294. Kiss Me Deadly (1955)


Running Time: 106 minutes
Directed By: Robert Aldrich
Written By: Mickey Spillane, A.I. Bexxerides, from novel by Mickey Spillane
Main Cast: Ralph Meeker, Albert Dekker, Paul Stewart, Maxine Cooper, Gaby Rodgers
Click here to view the trailer

BOX OF HELL!

My wife surprised me last night when she announced that she was in the mood for a movie and offered to check out one of the eighteen films I had scheduled to watch to finish out the ninth and next to last season of BOOK watching. After telling her what I had from Netflix, she decided on Kiss Me Deadly, a 1955 film noir and a pretty gritty one at that.


The fun begins when Cloris Leachman, making her big screen debut, comes trotting down the highway wearing only a trenchcoat, her bare feet slapping against the pavement. She runs out in front of an oncoming car, which just happens to be driven by our main character, Mike Hammer (Meeker). He gives her some lip for almost causing him to crash and then finally gives in when she begs for a ride. Up ahead, a police checkpoint reveals that the woman is actually escaped from the local mental institution. A wink and a nod from the girl, named Christina and Hammer tells the police that the girl riding shotgun with him is his wife. They're dismissed and continue on their way, with the girl asking to be dropped at the nearest bus station. Before Hammer can get the girl there, however, the two are ran off the road, Hammer being knocked unconscious. In an abandoned building, Christina is tortured (all we see and hear are her kicking feet and her screams of torture), while Hammer lays out cold. When Christina can't take anymore and dies, the two are loaded back into Hammer's car, where they're pushed over a cliff, thought to be sent to their fiery demise. However, Hammer makes it out alive and since he's a private dick, he's obviously on the case. Enter a slew of mostly seedy characters including Hammer's girlfriend Velda (Cooper), Christina's roommate Lily Carver (Rodgers) and a demented Dr. Soberin, who in the end gets his hands on a glowing case that has to be seen to be comprehended.

SPOILER ALERT!


You just can't tell me that David Lynch wasn't inspired in some way by this movie. I mean, look at these wacky characters who aren't all completely there and tell me those aren't early composites of David Lynch style persona's. Not to mention the night driving scene at the beginning of the film (we all know Lynch is keen on those) and the mysterious hell box, which just oozes Lynchian flavor. I can't say I was gaga about this one, but it definitely wasn't bad. One of my major complaints would have to be the appearance of too many characters, each not lasting that long but all being a major piece to the grand scheme of the whole movie. Names come at rapid fire pace and I'll be damned if I didn't get a little confused trying to keep everyone in order. By the end, I didn't know Lily Carver from Carmen Trivago and it got a little irritating. I guess you could say that's my problem as opposed to the movie's problem, but I feel like the simpler they could've kept things the easier this one would have been to enjoy. By the end of the movie, I'd forgotten how we'd even really gotten there or what we were trying to figure out. I mean, did they ever reveal who actually killed Christina anyway? Was it Dr. Soberin and Lily Carver a.k.a. Gabrielle? I mean, I realize WHY they killed her - in order to get the glowing box - but I'm pretty sure it's never 100% confirmed who did the torturing. By the way, THE BOOK says that Christina was vaginally tortured with a pair of pliers and what I'd like to know is how do they know that? Am I being stupid in asking that question? I mean, sure, one can assume that they're doing unspeakable, vulgar things to her in places that aren't allowed to be shown on camera, but one could also assume that the camera was kept low simply to let our imaginations run wild. Did THE BOOK let their imagination and the facts get blurred?


All in all, I think most will enjoy this. It's a really gritty noir, that doesn't come with all the fast talking of most, more mainstream noirs of the time. It also doesn't really have any names to speak of, which I kind of like, because it gives it that more realistic quality, like this could just be another episode of the Twilight Zone (especially considering that glowing box!). By the way, here's another stupid question: Was anyone else really shocked to see an answering machine pop up in 1955? I definitely was! Also, what was with that great apartment being leased by Mike Hammer? Private dicks are supposed to live in shoddy digs, across the street from some big glowing sign that constantly flashes in their window, not chic places with answering machines built into the wall. Oh and for you single guys, keep your eyes peeled for some serious eye candy in the form of Maxine Cooper (also her screen debut), Marian Carr, Leigh Snowden and even Cloris Leachman (for a little bit).

RATING: 6.5/10  Can't get it into '7' territory I'm afraid, but a rewatch when I'm a lot less tired and a lot more apt to follow the weaving storyline wouldn't be out of the question.

MOVIES WATCHED: 884
MOVIES LEFT TO WATCH: 117

December 21, 2014  9:48pm

Tuesday, January 10, 2012

393. What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? (1962)

Running Time: 134 minutes
Directed By: Robert Aldrich
Written By: Lukas Heller, from novel by Henry Farrell
Main Cast: Bette Davis, Joan Crawford, Victor Buono, Maidie Norman, Anna Lee
Click here to view the trailer

BETTE vs. JOAN

We're in the home stretch now and with less than ten films to go before I present a new TOP 20, a new contender emerges. There seems to be a recurring trend with these TOP 20's and how every time I get really close, I end up watching something really good, making the list that much harder to make.

The year is 1917 and Baby Jane Hudson is the flavor of the month, as far as child star's are concerned. She performs to crowds, who eat her act up and even has her own doll (only $3.25 a piece!). With all of her success, her sister Blanche is treated like the ugly duckling, being forced to look on while here sister gets all of the attention. Flash forward to 1935 and the table's have turned. Now, Blanche Hudson (Crawford) is one of the biggest movie stars in Hollywood and while Jane tries to make movies, they're usually regarded as rotten and sometimes even so bad that they don't get released. One evening, there is an accident and Blanche is crippled, presumably by her sister Jane, when she is run over by a car and her spine is broken. Flash forward to today, where Blanche and Jane live in the same house, with Blanche confined to the upstairs, forced to watch her success play out on television stations that air her old pictures. Jane is bitter, to put it mildly, living with Blanche and being forced to take care of her. Jane can't seem to let the past be, clinging to her days of stardom and burying her sorrows in liquor bottles. When Blanche makes some decisions to sell the house and admit Jane into a facility where she can get help for her drinking habit, Jane snaps!

As movie lovers, I think we've all had this feeling: You watch something that you had high hopes for and when it's finished you realize that it was just as good as you imagined. You're kind of disappointed, because you thought that it would be even better than you imagined and really throw you for a loop. That's what happened with me and "What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?", as I was actually disappointed when it was over and it just lived up to my expectations, failing to exceed them. However, I slept on it and it turns out that I was just being silly. It's hard to deny this film it's acclaim, as it stars two leading ladies really flexing their acting muscle. It probably helped that these two actually hated each other in real life (of course, I'm speaking of Bette Davis and Joan Crawford), because it probably only made them work that much harder. Imagine acting in a film, opposite your nemesis - you'd want to really put on a show to make them look weak, wouldn't you?

Actually, the real life feud between Crawford and Davis, in a way, overshadowed that greatness of the picture, as the entire time I kept thinking about how difficult this picture must have been to make. Imagine Robert Aldrich, a director just trying to tell a story, having to deal with this rivalry - poor guy. As far as the picture goes, as I said, it's brilliant. The story kind of borders on horror and drama and I couldn't help but remember James Caan, in his wheelchair bound state, in "Misery". The film has suspense, twists, great photography (loved the shot of Jane spinning around and around on the beach, clutching those ice cream cones) and as stated, marvelous acting.

RATING: 8.5/10 I'm tinkering with a shorter review format. I really feel that a lot of times, I just force myself to write more than I should and I'm trying to break that habit. More on this later. As for "Baby Jane", it comes with a terrific recommendation from yours truly.

MOVIES WATCHED: 392
MOVIES LEFT TO WATCH: 609

January 10, 2012 11:58am

Sins of Omission - Entry #94: ZODIAC (2007)

Running Time: 157 minutes Directed By: David Fincher  Written By: James Vanderbilt, based on the book by Robert Graysmith Main Cast : Jake...