Showing posts with label James L. Brooks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label James L. Brooks. Show all posts

Saturday, September 8, 2012

702. Terms of Endearment (1983)


Running Time: 132 minutes
Directed By: James L. Brooks
Written By: James L. Brooks, from novel by Larry McMurtry
Main Cast: Shirley MacLaine, Debra Winger, Jack Nicholson, Jeff Daniels, John Lithgow
Click here to view the trailer

DAMN! THIS MOVIE GETS ME EVERY TIME

I love "Terms of Endearment" and as a guy, I almost have to consider it a guilty pleasure. There's also the fact that the film is VERY Hollywood and as a film snob I also have to consider it a guilty pleasure. But I don't care, because I'll be damned if this movie doesn't get me every damn time I watch it.

The film opens with a mother tearing herself away from her husband because she has to check on the baby. The husband pleads with the mother to return to bed and assures her that the baby is fine, but the mother is insistent upon checking. Upon checking, the mother realizes that the baby isn't breathing. The father assures her that the baby is only sleeping and that she is fine. The mother is convinced that the baby has died of crib death and starts to climb into the baby's crib. Suddenly, the baby begins to cry and the mother's worries are put to rest. This kind of sets the tone for the film - a mother who would rather have her baby crying and unhappy, knowing she's allright rather than a baby who is happy, with the mother having doubts and worries. Aurora Greenway (MacLaine) is the mother and Emma (Winger) is her baby and over the course of the first ten minutes of the film, we're shown quick vignettes that shoot the characters into an older age. Emma plans to marry Flap Horton (Daniels), a man that Aurora isn't fond of and a marriage that she contests, citing that Emma isn't special enough to overcome a failed marriage. The film focuses on the sometimes atypical relationship between Emma and Aurora, as Emma DOES get married, moves to Iowa and begins a family of her own, always being sure to keep her mother on the other end of the phone. Meanwhile, Garrett Breedlove (Nicholson), an astronaut who moved in next door to Aurora years ago, finally breaks the silence between the two neighbors when the two plan a lunch date. Aurora, a classy, sophisticated older lady, is used to men worshiping her and when Garrett refuses to do so, he gets her attention with his crassness and straight forward attitude. The film follows the characters through MANY years and as time passes, you can't help but shed some tears for the characters and their situations. As Orson Welles said about "Make Way for Tomorrow", this movie would make a stone cry.


I get how some people don't like this film and usually snobby film types cite it as too weepy and too cliche. I understand those feelings, I just don't share them. When I was a kid, the Lifetime Network (a cable station in the U.S. that shows primarily made-for-television, chick flicks) would get about one "real" movie a month - meaning one movie that wasn't made-for-television and that had actually been in theaters. When they got THAT movie, they'd usually play it into the ground, showing it as much as their programming schedule would allow. One month, Lifetime got "Terms of Endearment" and as a young'n, I fell in love with this movie, watching it several times over the course of that month. I've often spoke of "my movies", the movies that have been favorites of mine for so long that they basically get a free pass. If the movies were bar patrons and I owned a bar, they'd be the types of movies that could simply walk in and say "put it on my tab". They're the movies that have sculpted my current, twenty-eight year old personal tastes. Why do I love "Terms of Endearment"? Because I just do! But there's more than that and like I always say, it's harder for me to explain why I like the movies that I've liked for so long.

I'm not one who cries that much at movies anymore. Sometimes it even bothers me that I can't be bothered to shed a tear, even under the most tragic of cinematic circumstances. Sometimes, I've encountered moments on film where I just wanted to stick myself with a pin, so that I'd cry for the characters that deserved to be cried for, but for whom my eyes just wouldn't well up. I've often wondered if I'm capable of crying during movies anymore and last night, "Terms of Endearment" answered my question.


There's this one episode of "The Big Bang Theory" (YES, I love that show) where Raj gets all cuddled up in bed, turns on the television and as he does, we hear: "Coming up next on Turner Classic Movies, Bridget Jones Diary". Raj replies with "Oh my God I'm crying already!", delivering his lines through a tissue. That's how I feel when it comes to "Terms of Endearment". As soon as the movie started and I heard that score (perhaps the most recognizable score in film history) my eyes knew they were in for a wet night. This movie also has the unbelievable power to make me smile and I'd call it, perhaps, the most "make me smile" movie in the history of movies. But it's not just that expression, it's others too. If a scene is sad, but not quite cry worthy, I'll snap out of my connection to the film to find my face contorted in a sort of half frown, giving my hearts to the characters who are moving me.

Technically, I love it too. The acting, for my money, is great and this is perhaps Shirley MacLaine's greatest role. I love Nicholson too and while the book suggests that the performances of those two threaten to upstage the performances of the others, I disagree. The score is one of my all-time favorite scores in film history, at times speaking for the characters and moving the story along just by being played.



SPOILER ALERT!

Weepiest moments for me personally: When Garrett appears at the top of the stairs in the hotel and he and Aurora reunite (EVERY DAMN TIME!) and of course, the scene where Emma dies.

RATING: 10/10  "Drugstore Cowboy" has been toppled and it's might just take the Rock of Gibraltar to move "Terms of Endearment" out of the #1 spot.

MOVIES WATCHED: 521
MOVIES LEFT TO WATCH: 480

September 8, 2012  11:07am

Saturday, November 20, 2010

766. Broadcast News (1987)

Running Time: 127 minutes
Directed By: James L. Brooks
Written By: James L. Brooks
Main Cast: William Hurt, Albert Brooks, Holly Hunter, Robert Prosky, Joan Cusack

AND NOW FOR SOME NEWS

With "Broadcast News" leaving the streaming portion of Netflix tomorrow, I decided I'd go ahead and watch it, so that I could avoid adding it to my regular queue. I was kind of anticipating it, seeing as how I've been a William Hurt fan for quite sometime and recently discovering the talents of Holly Hunter.

Our three main leads are Jane (Hunter), Aaron (Brooks) and Tom (Hurt). Jane and Aaron work at the Washington bureau of a TV network and scramble to perfect their news pieces to get them on the air. Aaron is a reporter and Jane a producer, for the network. They're best friends and have a tendency to call each other up for even the most menial of reasons. When Tom Grunick arrives in town, he comes off as a not so smart, yet handsome man, who Jane asks to dinner following his appreciation for her speech at a news conference. They go to her room after dinner and he confesses his lack of talents, as he is a sportscaster who, on a fluke, got thrust behind the news desk and became an anchor. She disapproves of his tactics and later he tells her that he has been hired by her station. From that point on, realizing Jane is someone who will tell him like it is and not just what he wants to hear, Tom is head over heels for Jane, chasing her throughout the film and trying to win her affections. Aaron also begins to feel love for Jane and trying to win her heart, fails, as Jane, possibly not wanting to taint the friendship, will not return Aaron's love. The whole thing is a big one-sided love triangle mess, all set inside the confines of a broadcast newsroom.

POSSIBLE SPOILER ALERT!

My biggest problem with "Broadcast News" was the characters. Jane wasn't a problem, as I thought Holly Hunter did great and I've actually known of a few girls like Jane, who are perfectionists and race around in frantic mode trying to meet deadlines and get things done. I thought Jane's daily cries were hilarious and provided a deeper insight into who Jane was, a character who could only take a minute out of her day to have for herself...and she chose to spend her minute crying. My character problems instead lied with the two main male leads, Let's take Aaron first. Was I supposed to sympathize with Aaron? We have this smart guy, who is nearly perfect at his job and is portrayed as an "I'm smarter than you" kinda' guy as a kid. He's funny yes, and for the most part he was the character that I wanted to get behind as the winner of Jane's heart. Then you have Tom, who is portrayed as kind of a dummy who gets thrust into the biggest news position that there is. Am I supposed to like a guy like that? I don't want to get behind the character who gets all of the things that he doesn't deserve. I guess they kind of lighten that up by having him admit the fact that he doesn't deserve it, but later he develops a bit of a cocky attitude, an "I'm better than you attitude" and yet he still seems to be the guy that the movie wants us to get behind.

Hell, maybe we're just supposed to like a little bit of everybody and get upset when things don't turn out perfectly for all of them, I don't know. Honestly, I was pretty much rooting for Aaron the whole time, as he was the funny guy who you kind of felt sorry for, despite the fact that he was a smart ass. Tom was just way too charming and snake-like for me to root for and like I said, I liked the character of Jane. The rest of the film was fine, really nothing good or bad, but leaning more toward the good side. The romance set inside a newsroom angle kind of worked for me, but not entirely and in the end I wasn't all that impressed. I did like the music, and on a side note, music has been something that I've really been picking up on in films lately, especially if it's really good or really bad.

RATING: 6/10 Nothing to really write home about here. The actors do a fine job, it's the characters who are hit and miss with me.

MOVIES WATCHED: 195
MOVIES LEFT TO WATCH: 806

November 20, 2010 1:10pm

Sins of Omission - Entry #94: ZODIAC (2007)

Running Time: 157 minutes Directed By: David Fincher  Written By: James Vanderbilt, based on the book by Robert Graysmith Main Cast : Jake...